Page 1 of 2

Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 14:40:54 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Huojin
You know the drill.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 15:44:56 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Huojin
Question for all of you: would you like a separate subforum for embassies? I've never been wild about the idea, since they seem criminally underused, but if people are certain they'll use them we can have them separately. Alternatively you can all throw them into the International Discussion forum and bring them up any time someone wants to publicly address you. Let me know your thoughts.

Also, players are encouraged to make national newspapers, but I'm also thinking a Newspaper Collection would be appropriate for people who'd rather post infrequently or when something interesting happens. Let me know what players prefer.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 18:57:45 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Luc
Huojin wrote:Question for all of you: would you like a separate subforum for embassies? I've never been wild about the idea, since they seem criminally underused, but if people are certain they'll use them we can have them separately. Alternatively you can all throw them into the International Discussion forum and bring them up any time someone wants to publicly address you. Let me know your thoughts.

Also, players are encouraged to make national newspapers, but I'm also thinking a Newspaper Collection would be appropriate for people who'd rather post infrequently or when something interesting happens. Let me know what players prefer.
Both ideas are good ones, besides, it wont hurt to have either, so i give it a go.

Second, Huojin, even though its a minor thing, you should have coloured more of the interior of brazil, especially in the northeast and central south, since the northeast was quite rich due to sugar cane plantations, and the central interior was VERY rich due to the wealthy deposits of gold and diamonds, and was very developed, but its just a minor detail.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 19:45:51 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Huojin
Luc wrote:Second, Huojin, even though its a minor thing, you should have coloured more of the interior of brazil, especially in the northeast and central south, since the northeast was quite rich due to sugar cane plantations, and the central interior was VERY rich due to the wealthy deposits of gold and diamonds, and was very developed, but its just a minor detail.
Thanks for this input Luc - especially as a Brazilian, it's great to have your knowledge. Do you have a map or something I can reference? I'm hesitant to draw it in without one - or at least some writings I can make comparisons against so it's more accurate.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 20:05:53 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Luc
Huojin wrote:
Luc wrote:Second, Huojin, even though its a minor thing, you should have coloured more of the interior of brazil, especially in the northeast and central south, since the northeast was quite rich due to sugar cane plantations, and the central interior was VERY rich due to the wealthy deposits of gold and diamonds, and was very developed, but its just a minor detail.
Thanks for this input Luc - especially as a Brazilian, it's great to have your knowledge. Do you have a map or something I can reference? I'm hesitant to draw it in without one - or at least some writings I can make comparisons against so it's more accurate.
Image

There we go, Minas Geraes is where all the gold and diamonds are btw.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 20:59:53 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Huojin
Made a small couple of changes, hopefully it's a little more representative.

http://i.imgur.com/zoopxbl.png

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 21:07:53 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Luc
Huojin wrote:Made a small couple of changes, hopefully it's a little more representative.

http://i.imgur.com/zoopxbl.png
Is it just me or you posted the wrong link? Cause this map is exactly the same as the previous one, or is it just my impression?

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 21:13:20 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Huojin
Luc wrote:
Huojin wrote:Made a small couple of changes, hopefully it's a little more representative.

http://i.imgur.com/zoopxbl.png
Is it just me or you posted the wrong link? Cause this map is exactly the same as the previous one, or is it just my impression?
Erp. Let's try this one :P

http://i.imgur.com/RLERUsc.png

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 21:21:18 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Luc
Huojin wrote:
Luc wrote:
Huojin wrote:Made a small couple of changes, hopefully it's a little more representative.

http://i.imgur.com/zoopxbl.png
Is it just me or you posted the wrong link? Cause this map is exactly the same as the previous one, or is it just my impression?
Erp. Let's try this one :P

http://i.imgur.com/RLERUsc.png
Ermm... still the same thing for me, at least. But dont worry, leave it, its just a map anyway.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 21:24:26 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Huojin
Luc wrote:
Huojin wrote:
Luc wrote:
Huojin wrote:Made a small couple of changes, hopefully it's a little more representative.

http://i.imgur.com/zoopxbl.png
Is it just me or you posted the wrong link? Cause this map is exactly the same as the previous one, or is it just my impression?
Erp. Let's try this one :P

http://i.imgur.com/RLERUsc.png
Ermm... still the same thing for me, at least. But dont worry, leave it, its just a map anyway.
Really? I mean, there's a pretty big difference. Perhaps you can illustrate for me what you're expecting it to look like.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 21:25:49 Friday, 14 October, 2016
by Luc
I see it now, my mistake then.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 15:19:44 Sunday, 23 October, 2016
by Huojin
So I wrote half the turn between 3 and 6 am, so if there are issues, please let me know promptly. Also if I forgot shit or screwed something up, or there's an important detail I skimmed over that you think it's important to note publicly, let me know that too. Though rest assured, I'll remember/keep a note of your detailed plans, even if the turn contains a briefer overview.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 01:14:34 Wednesday, 26 October, 2016
by Andre Massena
I think Poland and Prussia doing African and Asian exploration is pretty silly

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 02:58:34 Wednesday, 26 October, 2016
by Huojin
Prussia already has an African presence, in the form of its Gold Coast forts. So not that silly. Poland is a bit further towards the odd end of the scale, but it's worth noting that Courland held Caribbean colonies, Sweden held African ones, and the Danes held Indian colonies. All a little odd. But not beyond the realms of possibility for such nations to venture further afield than you think.

Not to mention that when it says "explorers", although the player is funding it from their credit bank, it is possible (and frequent in the turns) that such explorers will be treated as entirely or mostly private expeditions. Chartered companies are a little more odd, but even the Austrians took a stab at them, for how far it got them. Countries with a poor history of such kinds of expeditions will be less likely to find success, but it won't be for want of trying.

Re: Questions and Inaccuracies

Posted: 21:03:20 Wednesday, 26 October, 2016
by Smyg
Andre Massena wrote:I think Poland and Prussia doing African and Asian exploration is pretty silly
Yeah mate, I have three African forts, and am staying entirely in the area where they are.