THE LION ROARS: “NEVER AGAIN!”
The leadership of the new Arab Commonwealth meeting with Idi Amin, the new leader of Uganda
DAMASCUS: Crowds broke into cheers across the capital of Syria, as well as states around the Arab world, as President Hafez al-Assad announced to the international community the formation of the Arab Commonwealth (Ummat al-Arabiya). The Commonwealth, whose charter was officially proposed by Syrian representatives -including the new Defense Minister, war hero Mustafa Tlass- was quickly supported and submitted for a referendum by officials of the Libyan Arab Republic and Egypt, and welcomed by most officials within Syria as a move both towards pan-Arabism and a much-needed revision of the mistakes made by the late President Nasser, Father of All Arabs, promising an association of equals rather than dominance from Cairo.
President al-Assad, for his part, was well-received after the departure of Commonwealth delegates, particularly for his unusually passionate speech, in which he called upon the greater Arab world to remember the example of not just the Prophet Muhammad, but the founders of Judaism and Christianity, and turning the battle cry of the Zionists against them, promising that the division of Arabs by imperialism will happen “Never again!” Accordingly, it is expected that he will send delegates to Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and several other Arab states, both as an assurance of the Commonwealth's support of the Arab League and to bolster trade ties.
The latter decision has come under fire, however, with several hardliners -predominantly Jadidist sympathizers and suspected supporters of the Society of Muslim Brothers- condemning rapprochement with the Saudi monarchists and Iraqi putschists, respectively. One analyst within the Information Department explained the actions as “entirely in line with the ideology of the Arab Ba'ath”, explaining further that “Secretary-General Aflaq”, a term unused within the Syrian Regional Command since 1966, “labeled the ills plaguing Arab society as 'feudalism, sectarianism, regionalism, intellectual reactionism', and that regardless of state ties, the cause of Arab unity must be put first, to develop the liberty and socialism associated within our Renaissance.”
“Critics, therefore,” the analyst went on, “must first look at the influence of their own ideas. The sectarianism of the Arab world is a decadence imposed on us by the West, and the regionalism of the Jadid faction is a tool of ideological dogmatism more suited to the atheistic Marxism of the Eastern bloc. We must approach diplomacy with our brothers as one would their immediate family, for the spiritual-cultural ideology of the Arabs transcends the labels of power politics.”
President al-Assad was again unavailable for further comment, with insider sources claiming he was preparing for his hajj and an eventual statement on the Franco-Zionist coup attempt heroically beaten back by Colonel Gaddafi and the loyal Arabs of Libya. Defense Minister Tlass, characteristically, was much more candid, undoubtedly influenced by the assumption that Syria would be called upon for the first nomination of the Commonwealth's military commission. “Meir, you daughter of every Babylonian whore, we are coming! Your missiles are as gentle rain to the storm of Arab vengeance!” When faced with a raised eyebrow by SANA reporters, he added only, “Al-Quds, we are coming!”
EDITORIAL: THE ARAB PEOPLE'S WAR IS A POLITICAL WAR
By Mustafa Tlass, Syrian Minister of Defense
Brothers and sisters, in the treacherous corridors of government and the halls of the international community, you hear the wretched whispers of anti-Arab sentiment and divisiveness. There are ignorant critics of the Corrective Revolutions within Egypt and Syria that suggest a “betrayal” of the Arab world's friendship with the Soviet Union, when the truth is indeed the opposite. The Arabs, who have never been beholden to the Soviet Union -or indeed, any state, for such an idea is fundamentally colonialist and defeatist in attitude- retain their friendship with all state who oppose imperialism, from Africa to Moscow and Beijing. The ideological position of the Ba'ath is one of constant revolution against decadence and foreign attitudes; the split between China and Russia means as little to the Arab people as relations between the imperialist United States and their fallen lackeys in Westminster!
Therefore, when examining the recent arrival of Brother Lin Biao in Damascus, we must speak only of the relations of the greater Arab nation within itself. And here lies the truth of the supposed, and undoubtedly Israeli-sponsored, rumors of a Syrian and Arab “shift” to align itself with Beijing: our only ideology is that of the Ba'ath and Arab liberation, and while we may claim influence from the policies of Chairman Mao, we also claim influence from Marx, Western nationalists, and the Arab-Islamic prophets! But from whence does it come?
“When politics develops to a certain stage beyond which it cannot proceed by the usual means, war breaks out to sweep the obstacles from the way.... When the obstacle is removed and our political aim attained the war will stop. Nevertheless, if the obstacle is not completely swept away, the war will have to continue until the aim is fully accomplished.... It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.” -Mao Zedong, "On Protracted War" (May 1938)
It is the genius of Chairman Mao that his praxis lies as much as in the unity of all free peoples and the strength of a revolutionary movement as it does the Marxist dogmatism that we have, openly and comradely, criticized. One does not need a background in the ideologies of the Communists to understand what he is saying here: that there is no difference between the political confrontation of two parties (in his understanding, a “contradiction”, i.e. between two classes in the Marxist sense, but applied in our context, that of the Arabs and foreign aggressors) and open warfare between him. There is struggle always, in a dynamic sense. Vigilance, Chairman Mao says, is the byword of revolutionaries, for this unending conflict can and will often end in bloodshed.
“We should go to the masses and learn from them, synthesize their experience into better, articulated principles and methods, then do propaganda among the masses, and call upon them to put these principles and methods into practice so as to solve their problems and help them achieve liberation and happiness.” -Mao Zedong, “Get Organized!” (November 1943)
And this, friends, is the ends to which Brother Lin, a hero of the People's Liberation Army, provides the means. The Chinese military, much like our friends in Cuba and the policies of Brother al-Assad, is one in which the people move tirelessly toward a goal, not a separate force dedicated solely to the defense of a state. The “mass line”, also described by Mao but fundamentally a Ba'athist belief, is a perfect example of what must be done within the military forces of Arab states to remain viable. Let the Zionists and Westerners develop their high-tech weapons, and let us follow suit, but do not let us forget that the unity of the people, from all ideologically-pure classes, the Party, and the military apparatus, is the only approach worth applying in the context of the Ba'ath: it is the support of the people which makes the struggle against reaction viable, and it is the militant and revolutionary forces of the Arab world that make it practical!
So we reach the third, and most predominant, theory on which the supposed Chinese influence in Syria stems from: that of the people's war. While Mao spoke on the conditions within China fundamentally -that of a largely-rural uprising- it is the principle of the Chinese Revolution itself that we must adopt. If we accept the resolution of conflicts by the adoption of a pan-Arab, pan-class line against imperialism, our tactics become obvious. The population of the Arab nation, who already screams with every other breath for their leadership to join the Palestinians in striking the final blow against Tel Aviv, must avoid the decisive battles in which our enemies have become so fond of. As Che Guevara, that vaunted martyr of global liberation said, we must in essence create many Vietnams, until every strike -provided it is in sync with the masses and the revolutionary nature of the Arab people- against imperialism bolsters the resolve of our front and weakens the ability of the American-backed occupational force under the bloodthirsty Meir and their allies in Europe.
Our base areas, in conclusion, must therefore be the entire Arab world, who calls out according to the very nature of their blessed spirit against the dominance of our world by international power blocs. Only with this Arab mass line may we begin the political work, exemplified by the new Commonwealth, that will bolster our popular struggle and the thousand blows that will bring down Zionism, reaction, and the decadence that has long plagued our peoples.
Long live the Arab Renaissance! Long live Chairman Mao, Brother Brezhnev, and any friend of the Arab struggle! Long live Hafez al-Assad and the people of Syria!
Inside: Presidential tour of Africa in the making; condemnation of France reaches fever pitch; Iraqi tensions and the fate of the Ba'ath...